bkil vs. programming

I always look forward to making natural language processing more intelligent without hardwired rules. I also like the condensed style of the video. Build a Chatbot - ML for Hackers #6 video by Sirajology http://www.wildml.com/2016/04/deep-learning-for-chatbots-part-1-introduction/

I haven't noticed the keyboard layout switcher yet. How come it automatically contains exactly the three layouts which are relevant for me? I've found out earlier that both Search and Translate can correct your input if it makes more sense in some other popular layout, like Russian. What else is there under their sleeves?

I've minified  bkil-open: edu/ai/nanochess.hs  to 19 effective lines of code in Haskell, and I'm running out of ideas. The goal was to construct a tiny snippet of code that illustrates a real chess engine instead of the ever boring 8-queens. It still wouldn't fit on a black board properly without further pruning. At the same time, trivial concurrency has been introduced to bkil-open: edu/ai/minichess.lhs , which seems to give it a linear boost. My next step in the area is to add interaction and eventually introduce a more advanced algorithm like alpha-beta to gain playable speed on a full board with complete rules.